PDA

View Full Version : Forever linked to Bonds, Magowan could step down Friday


Bear
05-15-2008, 07:15 AM
It's no coincidence that news of Peter Magowan's possible retirement as managing partner of the San Francisco Giants is bubbling up at the same time as Barry Bonds news. Bonds' indictment was super-sized this week. Last week, the players association brought up the ever-popular collusion notion on his behalf. There is no escaping from Bonds. Not right now. Not in the near future. And if Magowan, indeed, does step down perhaps as soon as Friday, you can draw a direct line to Bonds as the cause for the effect wrote San Jose Mercury News comumnist Ann Killion.

Wednesday, Giants spokeswoman Staci Slaughter would not confirm a report that there is a 10:30 a.m. meeting scheduled for Friday for the 30 team partners, or that Magowan's retirement would be discussed at that meeting. Slaughter reiterated that, regarding retirement, "there is no final decision at this point," and that Magowan has considered stepping down "from time to time."

With so much smoke billowing from the story for almost a week, there is rampant speculation about the whys and wherefores and what-nexts. One theory is that Magowan, 66, is simply weary. Magowan has been embarrassed in front of Congress, humiliated by the findings in the Mitchell report and subjected to tough questions every time he appears in public. The other theory is that the Giants' multitude of partners would like Magowan out. That they view him as tarnishing their investment with his pandering to Bonds, with his obsession over aging stars while ignoring the farm system, with his overpaying of Barry Zito to dress up the Bonds Titanic.

Source: San Jose Mercury News


Like Bonds who will be remembered as a Giant Great, so will Magowan be remembered as a Great Giant Owner!:beerbang:

McCovey
05-15-2008, 05:47 PM
Magowan saved the Giants from moving to Tampa/St. Petersburg! For that alone I give Mr Magowan a :yes::yourock:

SF Kid
05-15-2008, 06:19 PM
Next..... :D

Bear
05-15-2008, 06:40 PM
Next..... :D
Next what? Sometimes I think you speak a different language tan the rest of us.:nono:

SF Kid
05-15-2008, 07:41 PM
Magowan is going. So what? It's time for a shake up. I'm all for getting rid of Sebean too. This organization is going nowhere under this leadership and it's been clear for a long time.

Bear
05-15-2008, 08:26 PM
Magowan is going. So what? It's time for a shake up. I'm all for getting rid of Sebean too. This organization is going nowhere under this leadership and it's been clear for a long time.


Well I hate to be the one to tell you the bad news but it is being said by many in the management/ownership team that with Magowan going Sebean will assume more power and say in the running of the team.;)

SF Kid
05-15-2008, 08:35 PM
Oh perfect.

Bear
05-15-2008, 10:04 PM
I knew that would make your day!:)

SF Kid
05-16-2008, 05:58 AM
The thing is Magowan and Sebean have had their chance to bring a world championship to San Francisco. They've had plenty of good teams, plenty of super stars playing on the club and can never put the final touches on a championship team. It's time to move on. It's time to put a better front office in place and put together a plan to get this shit right. 50 years of ineptitude is just terrible. It's just unacceptable. You can champion Sebean all you want but the guy has his way of doing it and it's hasn't worked and won't any time soon.

It's time for change.

McCovey
05-16-2008, 02:22 PM
Can we really hold Magowan and Sabean responsible for the 2002-03 teams? They were five outs away in '02 and couldn't finish the deal. :o That's on the players, not management. I thought the '03 was even better. Magawon and Sabean tinkered with the team and the team got off to a 13-1 start on the way to a 100 win season. Jason Schmidt beats the Marlins in game 1 of the NLDS then the Giants lose three straight to the Marlins? The Marlins? :shrug: The Giants should have crushed the Marlins. Giants' management put together a true championship team in '02-'03 (winning 195 games over these two seasons) and the players couldn't follow through. Another great team was the 2000 team that led the majors in wins (97-65). They got beat by the Mets in the NLDS. I still don't understand that one.

SF Kid
05-16-2008, 03:09 PM
...and the rest of the time those two have been running the show? Pitiful. Sure, give a monkey a typewriter and he'll spell a word but the Giants can't win a championship in 50 years and in the end that is what matters.

McCovey
05-16-2008, 05:46 PM
...and the rest of the time those two have been running the show? Pitiful. Sure, give a monkey a typewriter and he'll spell a word but the Giants can't win a championship in 50 years and in the end that is what matters.
I'm just saying that Magowan/Sabean have put together several teams that were legitimate world championship caliber teams. And the players just couldn't seal the deal.

SF Kid
05-16-2008, 07:37 PM
Seattle had a couple of championship caliber teams too. But in the end when Pinella begged for one more bat he didn't get it in the stretch run. That's management. I'd say the Giants are in a similar boat. In the end the players have t o get it done. But there have been a lot of teams that fail to close the deal by bolstering a very good team in crunch time with the final piece of the puzzle. Not sure that applies specifically to the two teams the Giants could have got it done but still I'm just feeling that the Giants are in definition of insanity mode -- doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result. I see the results and it's just not working. Time for change. I have no problem with cleaning house.